employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Greenhouse Software

Engaged Employer

Greenhouse Software reviews

3.7

60% would recommend to a friend

(364 total reviews)
avatar

Daniel Chait

81% approve of CEO

50% positive business outlook

Greenhouse Software has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 364 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Greenhouse Software employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

364 reviews
1.0
Jan 31, 2024

Dysfunctional, exploitative, insidious

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are no pros to working here.

Cons

I've worked in tech for 10+ years, and Greenhouse Software is easily the most insidious, unethical, and mismanaged company I've ever worked at. I sincerely urge you to consider another place to work. If given an offer, do your due diligence and read these reviews — then run. Exploitative “we’re a family, people first” is a giant red flag. — Yearly layoffs. The past 3 years have been rocked by annual layoffs, while executives and leadership line their pockets, vision remains unchanged. They have refused to take paycuts, nor any responsibility, nor made any meaningful changes to the company strategy. To add to this, the CEO has repeatedly lied about financial performance prior to each layoff so that employees have no advance warning. The leaders, including People teams and HR, have sought to hide their guilty conscience through euphemisms about "reduction in force," "right-sizing," and "reorganization,” when in reality they are ruining people's lives, careers, families, homes, and dreams. If you want to feel constant job insecurity from a clown CEO, join Greenhouse. — Product is mismanaged. Instead of releasing features that customers actually need, leadership is focused on destructive and harmful AI products, and constantly scrambling to catch up with competition through basics like app skinning and visualization. Product leadership routinely overrules product management, and directives from the top stifle creativity and vision. If you want to be told what to do, be micromanaged and overruled, join Greenhouse. Meanwhile the company is losing customers by the hundreds to apps like Ashby, Lever, and Workable because they are far more innovative and run far cheaper. This is not a new occurrence but a pattern for the past half decade. If you want to chase competition, be led by the nose and have your creativity stifled, join Greenhouse. — People are mismanaged. Middle managers are micromanagers, insecure, and fearful. They talk in circles, refuse to acknowledge high performers for fear it overshadows their own. There is zero accountability for management, zero internal mobility for everyone else, and there are almost never any open job posts. Contrast this with any other tech company of this size and age. These poor managers are rewarded through promotions because of office politics, it’s basically an old boys club. My own managers have received repeated rock-bottom feedback on quarterly reviews, and while they continue to perform abysmally, there are no signs their leadership cares or has made attempts to adjust their behavior. They get promoted to senior manager or director, failing upward contributes to a dysfunctional work environment. Meanwhile grunt employee pay is stagnant, and the company does not and has never offered cost of living adjustments. In fact pay has been outpaced by inflation over the past 8 years such that I am now paid less than when I joined the company. If you want to be paid below market, micromanaged, gaslit and exploited, join Greenhouse. — The culture is abysmal. This company pretends to be “different” and markets itself as “people first.” See the first bulletpoint about annual layoffs of its people. There is zero culture at this company. Their ERGs are exploitative of the people who run them, they aren’t paid or cared for and when layoffs happen, they disproportionately affect people of underrepresented statuses and in ERGs. The company culture is a concoction, it’s all a brand machine from a zealot marketing department. The CEO is also a marketer, and not a tech guy. The branded lies flow down from him. There are no get-togethers, conferences, kickoffs, or other employee events. You are sitting at your computer in your living room all day, totally disconnected, in silent Slack channels full of employees shocked and traumatized from the last layoff. If you want to experience a brain numbing lack of creative energy, join Greenhouse. — The customer experience is pure confusion. Convoluted UI with poor writing combined with the aforementioned stupid product decisions leads to constantly frustrated, confused customers who are abandoning the platform for cheaper, better, and more innovative alternatives like Ashby, Lever, and Workable. Enterprise doesn’t even entertain the app, as they are on Workday, iCIMS and ADP. What you’re left with is angry, annoyed SMB customers who have a million suggestions for improvement that product has to ignore because product leadership gets distracted by shiny objects. If you want to be berated by a shrinking, angry customer base, join Greenhouse. I cannot wait to find another job and peace out of this place. I wish someone had told me the truth when I joined years ago. Please pay heed to my post and others. Stay far, far away from this doomed place.

1.0
Jul 5, 2023

Company is run by liars and hypocrites

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I can't think of a single thing worth recommending in light of all the flaws.

Cons

Management lies to employees about promotions and about the business in general. Leadership is made up of nothing but cowards who refuse to take accountability when they screw up and never admit that they did anything wrong. Feedback to management is always ignored and their communication with employees is laughably inadequate and haphazard. There are practically no opportunities for career advancement or development, and everything the company says about being "people-first" is a straight lie. This company is 100% profit-focused to the exclusion of all else, but they try to gaslight you into thinking they support employees. They don't, as evidenced by the lack of raises this year, the layoff of over 100 employees in April, and the endless parade of negative changes the company has made to pass the brunt of its economic difficulties on to employees.

avatar
Greenhouse Software Response
3y
The amazing people who work at and lead this company with integrity are a huge reason so many of us are inspired to stay and build Greenhouse. Clearly you feel otherwise, which is disappointing to read. I'm not sure what we could do differently given your feedback but I hope you have been able to find a workplace that better meets your needs and expectations.
2.0
May 10, 2023

Shareholder-first, not People-first

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people; as so many others will say, the people at Greenhouse are the #1 reason why you will love working at the company. Mostly everyone is incredibly passionate about the mission of improving hiring, and are folks you'll create everlasting friendships with in and out of work. The product/services; the ATS and other hiring tools are second to none in the industry. Greenhouse has fantastic brand recognition and reception from recruiters, hiring teams, and especially candidates.

Cons

Executive/Board decision making; Greenhouse underwent a RIF in 2020 given the events surrounding COVID, and promised better planning to account for worst-case scenarios and emergency situations in the future. Instead, they continued to acquire another organization and accelerate hiring greatly in 2021 and 2022, all while the greater macro-economy still relatively suffered. Employees were told layoffs would 'likely not be needed' at the beginning of 2023, yet another RIF occurred in April. The rationale for the decision to proceed with a RIF was based around the 'declining economy'. Not once were the actions of the board/executive team driving unsustainable growth leading to this point called into question, nor acknowledged as a reason for the current state of the business. To my knowledge, none of the executives were affected in the RIF. 'People-First'; Greenhouse typically does a great job supporting their employees, emphasizing a people-first approach with different initiatives and offerings. However, in times of financial difficulty, they disregard this entirely. Examples of this include the systematic elimination/modification of employee benefits (e.g. removing unlimited PTO for non-exempt employees), closing offices, suspending promotion/mobility opportunities, RIF/layoffs, and more. The entire tone of the company shifted to a focus on dollars and cents, rather than people, around the time of their last major investment stake. Management/Senior Management; while promotion from within is facilitated, Greenhouse hired a ton of upper level management from outside the organization, many of which who were not suited for management responsibilities and did not understand the business. Decision making and collaboration in many departments became disorganized, confusing, and would constantly change. Compensation; many functions and departments are vastly underpaid, especially compared to other companies within software and HR technology. End of year reevaluations were minimal or non-existent, and a large reason why coworkers would leave.

avatar
Greenhouse Software Response
3y
Thank you for taking the time to provide such detailed feedback. Although some painful criticisms are leveled, it is nonetheless helpful to hear what your perspectives are. We will do our best to learn from these experiences and your comments are an important part of that. While I think some of the wording may be a bit absolute, nonetheless I do think there you make a number of fair observations. For example, it's true that after the initial shock of COVID and quarantine, we experienced nearly 2 years of unprecedented customer demand and growth. As this trend slowed and then reversed in the back half of 2022, we took a number of steps to reduce cost growth but, clearly, we could have done more. Always easier to see these things in hindsight but I agree that one lesson to be learned here is, when undergoing rapid growth, maintain a path to easing spend that minimizes disruption and pain. Also, it's true that internally our conversation has reflected this shift in emphasis. We are focused more on cost efficiencies now that the market has slowed. However I don't think that is the same thing as saying we are not "people-first", after all, in order to continue providing great career opportunities, strong culture, investing in DE&I, learning and growth, etc, the business must maintain sound economic footing. These are not either/or choices. In any event, thanks again for your comments, and your advice. It is well heard. And of course, I remain proud that despite it all, you view the people at Greenhouse as "the #1 reason why you will love working at the company." I agree!
Viewing 7 - 9 of 364 Reviews

Glassdoor has 380 Greenhouse Software reviews submitted anonymously by Greenhouse Software employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Greenhouse Software is right for you.