employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Henderson Engineers

Engaged Employer

Henderson Engineers reviews

3.6

58% would recommend to a friend

(197 total reviews)
avatar

Kevin Lewis

68% approve of CEO

69% positive business outlook

Henderson Engineers has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 197 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Henderson Engineers employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Construction, Repair & Maintenance Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

197 reviews
2.0
Jan 28, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent technical resources including highly knowledgeable people. Excellent IT department and support staff. The Quality Control department has some real teachers in it. They do achieve a reasonable work life balance for some of their employees.

Cons

Company meetings are little more than propaganda campaigns. There's a lot of talk about corporate vision but it is just talk. Little to nothing actually happens beyond wasting two hours of everyone's time. Projects tend to be formulaic which limits opportunities to stretch technical skills. Henderson does an incredible amount of Walmart work, which amounts to implementing a design prototype, not actually generating a design. Walmart work does not develop engineering skill but is extremely valuable to the company both in terms of profitability and in terms of helping it weather recessions. The result is that the people responsible for generating a large portion of the company's revenue are the least respected, least technically savvy, least likely to be advanced and most expendable. They also are the least desirable employees for every other team in the company giving them the least opportunity to change tracks internally. Henderson does not pay well. Leaving Henderson netted me a pay increase of nearly $15,000. When I researched pay while working there I found I was underpaid by between $10,000 and $20,000. When I spoke to management about this I was told that they thought we were adequately paid. Showing them a job offer I had received (a $9,000 increase over my then current salary) did not change anything. They do not pay well and they know it. They will also lie about what people should be paid and attempt to convince their employees that $10,000 below the industry average is reasonable. There is no transparency on how bonuses are calculated. On the two teams I worked on, both said that overtime was factored into how bonuses were calculated but, strangely, my two best bonus were in years when I worked the least overtime. Henderson makes a point of holding Beer-30s almost weekly, regular feel-good e-mails, having an in-office ping-pong tournament, annual golf tournament and other fun events to build company spirit. All of these exist to keep employees just happy enough to overlook the low pay. Overtime is encouraged but it also does not bear fruit beyond the paycheck. Overtime is not a path to advancement here. Advancement comes more from learning and knowing than from working longer hours. To that end, the best thing an employee can do to advance is get assigned to projects that stretch their technical skills. Rapid advancement comes from having friends in high places. Henderson is intensely political. Who you know, who likes you and their position in the firm is far more important than how good you are at the job. This was explicitly explained to me by one of my bosses. It was also not lost on me that so many people are promoted to owner by one particular Senior Vice President. Simply being very good at your job is not enough to get ahead. You must also be well liked by a number of other highly political people who are well liked by the person who promotes you. These people may be quite unlikable themselves. Management plays favorites. I worked on both a Walmart team and a non-Walmart team. On both teams there were clear favorites but on the non-Walmart team it was extremely evident. Who is and is not a favorite is not determined by skill, knowledge, experience or any objective measure. Instead it is based more on aesthetics - extremely good looking people with a modicum of technical skill become favorites. On three occasions I saw a person with 1.5 years of experience placed in a project management role where they managed people with 5-10 years of experience. In each of these three instances the inexperienced new project manager was exceptionally attractive. On multiple occasions I saw brilliant engineers with 5-10 years of experience passed over for valuable roles due to a preference for the more attractive but less experienced candidate.

avatar
Henderson Engineers Response
7y
Thank you for taking the time to write this review. We appreciate your candor and tenure with us at Henderson. 10 years is a significant contribution and we can't thank you enough. While your cons outweigh the pros in this review, we are still grateful that you shared your honest thoughts and concerns. Your feedback gives us the chance to grow and better meet the needs of our employees. We wish you the best of luck in your future. Thanks again for the review.
1.0
Jan 31, 2016

Does not take care of employees

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work hours, casual atire

Cons

Health benefits catered to single individuals with no spouse or family. Employees with families get no discount on health insurance. Company spends more money on marketing rather than employee retention. $750+/month for ok insurance. Management does not value employee's input or hard work, but rather glorify projects won through marketing negotiations. Level of quality and experienced engineers has taken a back seat in an attempt to become a larger company with younger and single employees who can dump 60+ hours with low pay into projects while giving up their weekend to work. Rarely do managers and owners work more than 45 hrs per week. Mangers and owners spend the majority of their day in meetings over scheduling of staff, marketing, and trying to explain why the large engineering mistakes were not the company's fault. Forget trying to advance in the company for actual engineering technical skills. Advancement favors socialites, brown nosers, gossipers, smooth talker charmers, and those with manipulative convincing skills. Rather than getting an engineering degree, you'd be better off just figuring out a way to brush up on your negotiation skills to win over clients and projects. Pay is lower than average with competition. Small raises once a year. Promotions and raises asked by employees are never granted. 8+ experienced employees seem to be unhappy and seeking other opportunities.

2.0
Jul 31, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-relaxed atmosphere -work life balance -get paid flat hourly rate past 40 hours

Cons

-pay starts out competitive but stops competing with market average from that point on unless you make it to management -If you get stuck on certain teams (Bravo Squad and Sector 5 when I was there) they will put you 90%+ of your time working on Walmart. They are their biggest client which fell into their lap by chance. Working on Walmart consists nearly entirely of copying a proto design with next to no engineering thought involved. a CAD tech is fully qualified to do it and they DO do it. When I left after working there for 2 years post-grad, I was terrified of the job market because I honestly felt like I had learned next to nothing there because all they would give me was Walmart work. They always allude to "graduating from Wal-mart work" but I looked around and saw people in their late 50s working on Wal-mart all day. -Getting paid past 40 hours means you are expected to work quickly. This can add stress if you don't work fast. -Vast majority of management is composed of just the people who have been there the longest from back when it was a 50 person company. They somehow link every single one of those people to the company's success. Not all managers were bad but there were a few on my team that were terrible at managing. -Way too top-heavy. Constantly adding more and more senior roles without adding to the people actually getting the design work done.

avatar
Henderson Engineers Response
8y
Thank you for leaving a review. We appreciate the feedback and the time you spent with us. Although we do have large clients with which we do a lot of work, we work with many other big- name brands across several practices. For the majority of our employees, work is always interesting and provides opportunities to learn. We do our best not to pigeon hole our employees into one specific type of work. Again, we appreciate your feedback. Best of luck to you in your future endeavors!
Viewing 1 - 3 of 197 Reviews

Glassdoor has 216 Henderson Engineers reviews submitted anonymously by Henderson Engineers employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Henderson Engineers is right for you.