Influence Health reviews

Nepotism was rampant. Few promotions for current employees as the friend of someone with influence often was installed before interviews occurred with those on the inside Chaos erupted beginning in 2011. Many GREAT managers (and a few not-so-great) were let go while (I assume) better-connected, less-capable managers remained. Product design was not epistemic at all. There was no wealth of evidence that could overturn the misguided opinion of a manager -- unless it saved money or time. Jargon was the preeminent currency, even if it had no financial backing. I'm quite sure that some people were promoted through their presentation of a preponderance of meaningless techie-sounding words hastily concatenated and finalized by a declarative smirk. Some employees did an amazing job while working in a particular area for a good manager, but after moving to a different area with a different manager, they'd be gone within a few months. I never heard any of them express concerns and many of them appeared to be just as productive as ever. It seems that perhaps merit is a lower priority than manager whims.

dwindling remote work force, company changes direction/leadership too frequently, dev team turnover.