Milliman reviews

3.9

68% would recommend to a friend

(895 total reviews)
avatar

Dermot Corry

91% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Milliman has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 895 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Milliman employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

895 reviews
2.0
Jan 8, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

quiet and organized office interesting work free drinks and snacks in the kitchen supply room is well stocked IT staff is great office parties fun staff holiday dinner retirement plan nice conference room great location

Cons

some of the profit centers have a major problem with disappointment, you can see this through body language. nonsensical raises and bonuses. lack of professional development. blockheads can ruin the atmostphere in the office. poorly communicated goals and objectives. work needs to be reviewed more carefully by principals. small mistakes can be overlooked and discovered later, but if the client has paid then it's never addressed. some employees are assigned too much work so the work quality can suffer. other actuarial firms provide more exam and educational support. It's ashame, but senior staff may never give official credit to staff who have done the majority of the work. revenue can go up but staff will get the short end of the stick, and be handed a check with a smile on their supervisor's face

1.0
Jun 18, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Learned a lot from many different actuaries, good exposure to different types of actuarial work.

Cons

Way too much focus on billable hours, too much negative office gossip and negative support for passing exams. No training in this position (because training can't be billed to a client). No support for office camaraderie because you cannot bill that time to a client. Once people start to dislike you (for whatever reason) you will get disciplined for all kinds of things even though everyone else does the same thing. The biggest surprise to me is that at this location management actively tries to stop their aspiring actuaries from taking and passing exams. You would think a consulting company would highly encourage exam progress because they could charge more for your time once you achieve your designation, but I find the exact opposite to be true. I have been told on numerous occasions that I should not take exams and that I should spend more overtime working as opposed to studying. I recommend not working here unless you are okay with being treated like dirt for the first five to ten years. After you make it through the first ten years and are a consultant, you are pretty much worshipped, so I suppose that isn't so much a con.

1.0
Sep 21, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not much pros really about working in actuarial consulting and no pros at all about working for Milliman.

Cons

My former boss, who at one point in his life worked as a garbage man, was an exceedingly abusive, dishonest, and highly unprofessional person. He was a blue collar man in a white collar profession. He used to sexually harass coworkers and secretaries and made obscene jokes about gays and minorities, but somehow he got away with it because he was in charge and either no one wanted to make a stir by complaining to upper management or the managing principals turned a blind eye to his behavior. He was highly skilled in lowballing reserve requirements to make his clients happy to win and retain business. Reserve calculations have PLENTY of wiggle room for these dishonest actuaries to pick low development factors in order to force a low reserve requirement. He's now in charge of the P&C actuarial side of a big accounting firm, in New York. Whoever said the big accounting formers have high moral standards?!! I really think this guy should have been fired long ago and have had his FCAS designation revoked by the CAS for dishonest and unprofessional conduct. He was admired by a few colleagues at Milliman and a couple of underlings for his successful career (as a slave driver) and frat boy style behavior. One of his underlings who wanted to emulate him also picked up his dishonest habit of inflating billable hours: example billing 11 hours over 8 hours worked on numerous occasions even during slow months. That dishonest underling also no longer works at Milliman. I think he's now an actuarial manager at an insurance company. Somehow money attracts these crooks into the actuarial profession and they thrive in it, even though they can't make the cut doing anything else that's rewarding. The hours at Milliman were frequently terrible during annual statement and quarterly statement times. Then there were a few months of total lull after statement times with nothing to do and we had to sit around worrying about our job security and on a couple of occasions the rotten former boss actually joked about laying off his people. I suppose it's not any worse than professionals in high tech, but the pay at Milliman was not commensurate with the effort. There is no overtime pay. "As professionals, you are expected to work overtime without compensation," or words to that effect. My abusive former boss did not want me to advance too fast by passing too many exams so he openly discouraged me from studying. That way he could keep on paying me a measly salary with meager bonuses. If you had too many billable hours on a project, they'd get upset because they couldn't bill the clients too much and they had to write off the hours they couldn't charge the clients, and the rotten former boss felt that write-offs looked bad to his own boss, so I felt pressure not to have to many billable hours. If I billed too little they'd feel, I was not worth the pay they gave me. This is quite typical in consulting. A few favored star performers got all the perks and special treatment but I was not one of them, but the vast majority were just slaves or cogs on a wheel. They were exceedingly stingy with paying for study materials. I had to make do with copies of someone else's incomplete copies of yet someone else's outdated and incomplete copies of study materials to get by to prepare for the exams. In most cases I ended up paying hundreds out of my own pocket with no reimbursement to buy the study materials. As a mid-level analyst, my job was complete drudgery, simple spread sheet formulas ad nauseum. Forget about what you learned from your exam studies. You won't be using 99.99% of any of the theories or concepts you picked up from your studies. Like I stated before, spreadsheet work, column 1 + column 2 - column 3, etc, etc, ad nauseum. And you had to do it with complete accuracy. Three years into my term at Milliman and I began to develop beginning stages of carpal tunnel syndrome from cranking out numbers on a spreadsheet at an inhuman rate. It took me years after I left the firm to recover from the injury. The worst part about working for Milliman (or any actuarial consulting firm, I suppose) for me was having to recall details at a moment's notice from the NUMEROUS reports and spreadsheets I had ever worked on whenever the boss asked for or when a client needed information from the reports right away. Some of those reports could be a couple years old. I didn't have a good memory and struggled in this area and occasionally incurred my former rotten boss' wrath when I could not give him answers instantly on older reports. If you look at the pictures of all their 100+ principals and associate principals nationwide in their yearbooks, you'll notice there are no non-white partners. You could argue that perhaps there aren't enough qualified minorities good enough to rise to that level or you could argue that perhaps the culture and hiring practices are not conducive to attracting and retaining minorities in this firm. My former boss did not like minorities and did not hire them if he could help it and once even openly bragged about having forced out a few his non-white underlings that he inherited from someone else. I think it's a combination of all these factors that there are no non-white principals anymore at Milliman. They really had to work hard to accomplish this whites-only company among its 100+ principals in this day and age. What are the odds that it's a freak occurrence? I read some Milliman reviews here on Gassdoor that mentions their Milliman coworkers as being "bright." Well, the Milliman coworkers and managers I had were anything but "bright." The principals and managers had a decent proficiency with numbers, but no facility with theory at all. Some analysts may have very good spreadsheet or even programming skills but nothing really to rave about. The vast majority of them were simply mediocre or average at best. Many are stuck at their level and can't pass exams and simply just gave up at a low to mid level. Well, you aren't likely to find many REALLY bright people at Milliman. Maybe the other reviewers don't know what really bright people are like. Getting into the actuarial profession was a huge mistake in my life. And accepting that job offer from that abusive, dishonest, and unprofessional former boss was a bigger mistake still. I have since changed career and became an engineer and am infinitely happier and probably make much more money than if I had stayed at Milliman.

Viewing 7 - 9 of 895 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,081 Milliman reviews submitted anonymously by Milliman employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Milliman is right for you.