No up-level reviews and this is desperately needed.
Incredibly hypocrisy. For a company that prides itself on values such as "Caring Deeply" and "Being a Better Neighbor" as well as offering leadership development workshops in an effort to cultivate a productive work environment where people operate with integrity (i.e., not jumping to conclusions and "left-hand column" tactics), leadership tolerates openly destructive and aggressive behavior on behalf of exec.
Since the acquisition, the push for "growth" in tandem with the IKEA partnership has resulted in major turnover: execs, directors and senior engineers have left as well as more junior staff who've worked with the company for years. Some rumored and very plausible reasons for departure have included new policies surrounding deadlines (without regard for the feasibility of these deadlines), a thick sense of hierarchy, getting physically sick because of the stress, and destructive / resource-draining finger-pointing. Not only does it cost a minimum of $50K to replace some of these hires, but the folks who left abruptly or who were terminated (which has its own costs) in the name of "growth" have not been adequately replaced, and the missing resources have resulted in profound disorganization. Frankly, many of those who remain under bad leadership are too afraid to communicate their needs to their boss to work effectively which has led to cascading disorganization on other teams (e.g., bad managers don't help their team prioritize and structure requests to technical team members and then those members are put in front of a firing squad). The bottom line experience for anyone expected to work on growth (which appears to be the entire company regardless of how futile and impotent this effort is) is that your gonna be caught in a totally pointless political battle where you learn nothing and are on the spot for any failures that can plausibly be offloaded to you. You'll also probably be fired because that's seems to be the default.
Outside of being suddenly let-go, there are ALSO an inexcusable number of people on PIPs across the company (in some cases a department majority). At best, this speaks to terrible management, at worst it leaves the impression that the company is plagued by financial problems that they're not being upfront about and are choosing to manage people out instead. Either way, there is no excuse for not vetting the bad reviews and for creating a totally toxic work environment. And to echo what the other poster wrote, there is no clear path to advancement (put another way, you can get a bad review for totally arbitrary reasons).
Most people are radically under-utilized, performing a massive amount of tedious tasks and getting blamed if anything falls through the cracks. I've watched people lose skills and become less competitive just by being here which make the place feel like an authoritarian career trap. If this is the future of work: run.
