Toast Inc reviews

Workload - you will be over utilized. SLT strategy changes constantly. Disjointed tools. Plenty of offshoring for roles. Opportunities for pay increase/promotion is getting sparse due to cost cutting. There will be any reason to minimize your impact in performance reviews to prevent justified pay increases or stock grants. My last review held me accountable to something I had no control over, which prevented stock grants and a real pay increase. It was disappointing. Also, there are a lot of folks in positions they are too junior for. Finance department is lost. There are numerous projects in flight and are all running at P0. But, the roadmap and change management is awful. It's thrown by the wayside to just cross the finish line. Turbulent job security. People have recently left over the past few months to "take a break" or "spend time with family." So, everyone just works long hours out of fear of being leg go. CEO - hinted at some form of RTO for "collaboration." But, it's being disguised as "ways we work." Many are conscious about "being negative." However, being negative is deemed just not fully falling in line with something. If you value your job, don't question, don't even respectfully disagree, just fall in line. Sad but true.

Con #1: As the abovementioned scheduled "career growth" time was only allowed pending lower call-volume-to-available-agents ratios, most of my cohorts in the Payments division (including myself) rarely--if ever--got to utilize that time for as long as I was at Toast. The above stipulation is an understandable one; a company can't exist for long without satisfied customers who aren't forced to wait tens or hundreds of minutes for assistance. But the Payments division was not at all sufficiently staffed to meet that goal of little-to-no customer wait time AND high-quality assistance from agents. Con #2: Metrics WERE tightened for ALL support divisions after the IPO, but all support divisions were then being measured by the SAME metrics (while I was working there at least). This contributed heavily to the Payments division's metrics (particularly metrics of total call time, on-hold time, and casework wrap-up time) look consistently terrible in comparison to other divisions such as Hardware and Networking. On top of getting some of the most panicky and/or vitriolic, expletive-brandishing, abusive callers, Payments also often had to contend with extremely complicated questions (many factors involved including restaurants' on-site cash management, credit card processing, and customer billing); it was ludicrous to try and evaluate the division's overall efficacy using the same time metrics as Hardware or Menus. (On the flip side, Payments' CSAT scores were generally comparable to other divisions, and I was personally told by customers at least once or twice per shift that I was the most helpful agent at Toast that they had ever worked with, that I actually helped them solve their issues and empowered them for the future.) Con #3: Sort of a culmination of Cons #1 and #2. I was friends with Toast coworkers across almost every other customer support division; the majority of them had time to get up and stretch, to make use of the in-office amenities, and to actually put time and energy into growing within the company (i.e., make use of their scheduled "career growth" time and to organically network with other employees). This was rarely if ever the case for those of us in Payments, and on top of being charged with some of the most abusive callers (because they were most often calling when furious about money matters), it *stung* so sharply that we were seemingly left behind while other (also hard-working) divisions were thriving. Con #4: It took so long for my work technology stipend to be approved that I was never actually able to use it while at Toast (the people approving these were random, it seemingly had nothing to do with cohorts that had the same starting date). Con #5: I also had issues with Toast-issued tech; I did my best to make things work with what I had while also (in my free time) researching what the cause(s) might be and what solutions might be available to me. I *did* discover the issue (there was a difference in the tech's internal components in what was issued to my "class" versus those who had started earlier that year). But it took me *months* to get anyone with power to issue me replacement tech to even believe that I was correct in my assessment (and I provided every kind of evidentiary support I could, including photos I'd taken, screenshots from manufacturer websites, step-by-step troubleshooting I'd done). Several people tried to help me "figure it out, it's just kinda tricky" without replacing my tech only to go "oh...huh, that's weird, it's not working." It was so frustrating to be repeatedly dismissed only to then have multiple people come to the same conclusion I had.