UserTesting reviews

3.3

56% would recommend to a friend

(90 total reviews)
avatar

Eric Johnson

62% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

90 reviews

Reviews about "Management"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Mar 23, 2016

Sales review

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Easy-to-describe product. Lots of case studies and other sales collateral. Good healthcare and vision, decent dental, fair and understanding middle-management, lunches twice a week, weekly massages, matching 401k. Management is pretty flexible on work/life balance and doesn't micro-manage, which is nice.

Cons

They made the most common mistake in Silicon Valley: thinking that more sales people = more sales. See how that's working for Zenefits and a thousand other under-performing companies. Instead of creating a recurring lead generation machine, they've assigned their entire SDR team to qualify inbound leads. Instead of hiring more SDRs to do outbound lead generation by prospecting into new companies, management has doubled the size of the sales team and created two new teams out of thin air; none of which has nearly enough to do or enough leads to hit their quotas. They now expect their highest-paid employees to do the lowest-value work, which has achieved predictable results. Many reps had less than 20 demos in the entire first quarter! This has accomplished two things: lowered earnings per rep by more than 50% (nearly across the board) and caused employee morale to plummet. SDRs are desperate to hit numbers so they pass mediocre leads. AE's are desperate to hit numbers so they convert mediocre leads. If you're being hired for a sales role at UserTesting, do yourself a favor and ask to speak to a rep that was with the company prior to August 2015 to get a comparison of how things were and how they are now.

5.0
Mar 2, 2016

Fantastic Place to Work

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Food, massages, game nights, sports nights, awesome coworkers, education stipend, career development, career growth, caring management, recognition for great work, monthly Q&A with Execs, the list goes on.

Cons

Physical HQ space could use some improvements. Company culture disconnect between offices. Salary could be more competitive. Dramatic difference between team perk budgets.

1.0
Feb 13, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A lot of us have become good friends, which is one of two reasons I haven't quit yet. In fact, it's one of the biggest reasons most of us are still here. Those who suffer together... The other reason I haven't quit yet is because there's some flexibility (depending on your direct manager) with working from home - which is always a savior on the sanity front. Dog friendly!

Cons

CSMs get judged on a LOT of metrics, and are constantly hounded when one of them drops. It's unreasonable to be expected to respond to e-mails within 2 hours AND reach out to all customers at least once every two week with proactive & strategic material AND take care of all project management AND attend all the internal meetings AND conduct quarterly business reviews with all your customers - who by the way, don't actually want to do because they're also busy - AND everything else. There's only so many things you can work on if you want to keep your sanity and not work 15-hour days. Too many internal meetings. Granted, not all of them are explicitly mandatory, but management notices when you don't attend and you get verbally berated anyway. CSMs are the *only* people in the company who get "rated" by at least 5 different other teams in the company, and by customers as well. It's a lot of pressure to keep all of those ratings up. Ever since they created the Customer Operations Manager role to manage the CSMs, there's been a *lot* of micromanaging. When things go wrong, upper management demands to know what *YOU* did wrong. Yes, sometimes, it's our fault. But sometimes, failure is inevitable and instead of being asked why we failed and how we should handle it in the future, it would be much better for morale to show empathy, put them in our shoes and see how difficult it is. Speaking of which, a lot of customers are *not* suitable for our platform and services, but they get sold - and often times oversold - anyway, and then CSMs have to deal with them for a whole year. You basically get set up for failure. When researchers mess up on a study (or multiple studies) it's also your responsibility, even though it's not your job to do research, because your supposed to know everything - and I mean EVERYTHING - about the customer, so nothing should have gone wrong. Internal tools are a pain to use and when we make product requests, it's hard to get them pushed through. Big changes happen often and without your input. They recently hired an exec who has caused a lot of friction/drama with people, turned the Customer Success team into sales - essentially, and just gives off a really inauthentic aura that makes most of us uncomfortable. He comes from a very corporate background, which stuck to him, and doesn't mesh with our company culture. And while he claims that he knows how miserable we are (which everyone seems to have noticed, and obviously not a good sign), nothing he's done so far as shown us that he actually cares. In fact, he doesn't take feedback well at all - after starting at UT, he created an account manager role called Customer Growth Executives, which the majority (if not all) of CSMs (and even CGEs) did not feel comfortable with, because it gave the impression that they were there to increase the dollar amount of contracts - which is true, but he meant for it mean that CGEs were there to support the customer and grow their business. After almost all the CSMs and CGEs said they felt like it meant increasing the dollar amount of the contract and were therefore using the title of "Account Manager' instead, he ignored us all and "decided" that it was going to be CGE. Pay is not up to par with the industry standard. When some of us raised this concern, upper management told us that when Client Success Coordinators became CSMs, it was due to an internal reorg and not an actual promotion - which is true, *however* that internal reorg also gave us at least twice the amount of work, so the slight increase in our salary was not justifiable and STILL below industry standard. These are just *some* of the things that are driving CSMs crazy - and away from the company itself.

Viewing 73 - 75 of 90 Reviews

Glassdoor has 807 UserTesting reviews submitted anonymously by UserTesting employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if UserTesting is right for you.